Back to News
Trump Demands CFTC’s Sole Control Over Prediction Markets, Slams State Regulators

Trump Demands CFTC’s Sole Control Over Prediction Markets, Slams State Regulators

President Trump publicly supports the CFTC’s exclusive federal authority over prediction markets amid state legal challenges, criticizing state officials opposing this. This highlights regulatory friction in the crypto and prediction market space.
Donald Trump publicly backed the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) exclusive jurisdiction over prediction markets in a blunt post on Truth Social Tuesday, reinforcing his appointed CFTC Chair Michael Selig’s combative stance against several states’ efforts to regulate or ban event-based contracts.

The former president’s message singled out four state officials by name – Chris Christie, Letitia James, Tim Walz, and JB Pritzker – branding them “SCUM,” a rare and personal attack in regulatory debates. Christie, the ex-New Jersey governor, has defended states’ rights to oversee gambling products; New York Attorney General Letitia James is pursuing lawsuits against prediction platforms Kalshi and Polymarket for alleged violations of state gambling laws. Meanwhile, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz recently signed the nation’s first explicit ban targeting prediction markets, and Illinois Governor JB Pritzker’s administration has issued cease-and-desist orders against several of these platforms.

Trump framed the federal fight as part of a larger competition for global crypto dominance, declaring the U.S. “the Crypto Capital of the World” and warning that foreign rivals are actively attempting to supplant America’s position. This rhetoric dovetails with the CFTC’s ongoing litigation strategy: the agency contends that designated contract markets (DCMs) registered with the CFTC have exclusive federal oversight over prediction contracts, effectively pre-empting any state-level restrictions. In contrast, states argue these contracts resemble gambling products tied to elections, sports, or entertainment and thus fall under their gaming laws.

The legal battle escalates as the CFTC, currently chaired solely by Selig, has engaged directly in at least six states – filing suits or joining as amici in Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, New York, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. These disputes are pivotal because they test federalism boundaries in regulating emerging crypto-related derivatives, reflecting broader tensions in U.S. crypto policy.

Complicating the agency’s position, a recent New York Times investigation alleged that career CFTC staff who flagged potential national security risks tied to Polymarket, Crypto.com, and other firms connected to the Trump family were sidelined or forced out. Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) responded sharply on X, accusing the CFTC of becoming “a craven tool of prediction markets and shady crypto firms” while retaliating against whistleblowers trying to enforce laws. Notably, Donald Trump Jr. holds strategic and investment ties to Kalshi and Polymarket through 1789 Capital, deepening concerns about political interference.

Prediction markets are small but influential corners of the crypto ecosystem, particularly in derivatives and liquidity provision. Watch for the courts’ rulings in the CFTC-state disputes over the next year – they will set a precedent for crypto regulation balance, federal pre-emption, and the durability of state gaming laws. The outcome could also influence Bitcoin’s trading environment, given the bullish emphasis Trump places on U.S. crypto leadership amid rising global competition.